Does Useful Field of Vision Predict Attention While Driving Between Young and Older Adults?

Abstract The Insurance Information Institute (2017) reports drivers aged 65 and up are involved in the second highest rate of fatal car crashes. It is important that there is a fair and standardized assessment to test driving fitness. The prime objective was to assess the utility of the Useful Field of View (UFOV) across young and old groups to predict performance on a simulated driving exercise. Community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older (n=48) and students (n=48) recruited from an undergraduate research pool served as participants. They completed a series of demographic, health and cognitive measures, besides a Useful Field of Vison (UFOV) task and a driving simulation exercise. Results showed that collision avoidance and braking varied between age groups, with older adults appearing to be less likely to avoid collision (Older M = 12.46, SD = 10.25, Younger (M = 7.96, SD =4.92; n = 47), but quicker to brake (Older M = 3.64, SD = 3.41, Younger M = 9.79, SD =7.91). There were group differences for driving simulator performance, predicted by cognitive measures (Young; R2 = .099, p = 0.005; Old; R2 = 0.094, p = 0.038). UFOV scores did not predict group differences in driving simulator performance (Young; R2 = 0.009, p = 0.664; β = 0.089, p = 0.437) , (Older; R2 = 0.061, p = 0.522; UFOV-DA β = -0.074, p = 0.555; UFOV_SA β = 0.289, p = 0.194). These findings have implication for the development of pragmatic capacity to drive assessments.

decline (SCD), that is, self-perceived worsening of cognitive functions that has been associated with increased risk of future dementia. Here we investigated the relationship between SCD symptom burden and technology proficiency. A nation-wide sample of adults (N=483) ages 50-79 (66.5% female; 14.5% age >70) completed an online survey via a crowdsourcing website, Amazon Mechanical Turk. The survey included the Subjective Cognitive Decline Questionnaire (SCD-Q MyCog) (0-25, M=4.71, SD=5.77), questions about respondents' proficiency with computer, smartphone, and tablet (4-12, M=9.72, SD=1.97), and the PROMIS depression (M=13.18, SD=6.32) and anxiety (M=13.04, SD=5.68) scales. Linear regression was used to examine the ability of technology proficiency to predict SCD score. We also probed the interaction of technology proficiency with age (<70 vs. >70 years), and adjusted for covariates. We found that the age/technology interaction (B=-0.80), older age (B=7.49), lower education (B=-1.08), higher depression (B=0.20) and anxiety (B=0.16) symptoms predicted higher SCD burden (R-squared=.16). For respondents >70 years low technology proficiency predicted high SCD burden (B=-.79) whereas for those <70 years no relationship was found. Our study draws attention to older adults' self-experienced cognitive function in the digital era. The association between low technology proficiency and SCD may signal the adverse impact of the digital era on those who experienced technology only later in life. It is equally possible that declining technology proficiency is an indicator of emerging neurodegenerative disease.

DOES USEFUL FIELD OF VISION PREDICT ATTENTION WHILE DRIVING BETWEEN YOUNG AND OLDER ADULTS?
Rebecca Dunterman, 1 and R INTRIERI, 2 , 1. Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States, 2. Western Illinois University, Macomb, Illinois, United States The Insurance Information Institute (2017) reports drivers aged 65 and up are involved in the second highest rate of fatal car crashes. It is important that there is a fair and standardized assessment to test driving fitness. The prime objective was to assess the utility of the Useful Field of View (UFOV) across young and old groups to predict performance on a simulated driving exercise. Community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older (n=48) and students (n=48) recruited from an undergraduate research pool served as participants. They completed a series of demographic, health and cognitive measures, besides a Useful Field of Vison (UFOV) task and a driving simulation exercise. Results showed that collision avoidance and braking varied between age groups, with older adults appearing to be less likely to avoid collision (Older M = 12.46, SD = 10.25, Younger (M = 7.96, SD =4.92; n = 47), but quicker to brake (Older M = 3.64, SD = 3.41, Younger M = 9.79, SD =7.91). There were group differences for driving simulator performance, predicted by cognitive measures (Young; R2 = .099, p = 0.005; Old; R2 = 0.094, p = 0.038). UFOV scores did not predict group differences in driving simulator performance (Young; R2 = 0.009, p = 0.664; β = 0.089, p = 0.437) , (Older; R2 = 0.061, p = 0.522; UFOV-DA β = -0.074, p = 0.555; UFOV_SA β = 0.289, p = 0.194). These findings have implication for the development of pragmatic capacity to drive assessments.

DRIVING FREQUENCY AND WELL-BEING IN OLDER ADULTHOOD
Zainab Suntai, Kefentse Kubanga, Abhay Lidbe, and Emmanuel Adanu, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States The activity theory of aging suggests that older adults age successfully when they remain active and engaged. While many older adults are still able to drive, not all are as engaged in social activities, despite having the transportation to be able to do so. As such, this study aimed to examine the association between the frequency of driving and overall well-being among older adults. The hypothesis is that older adults who drive more frequently would have higher well-being, as they are likely driving to engaging activities. A sample of 1,663 older adults who reported that they are able to drive were derived from the 2018 National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS). The NHATS is an annual longitudinal panel of survey of adults aged 65 and older living in the United States. Chi-square tests were used for bivariate analyses and a weighted multivariable logistic regression model was used to predict well-being based on driving frequency. Results showed that compared to those who drive every day, those who drive most days (OR=0.771, CI= Interventions geared at improving well-being among older adults should therefore consider increasing awareness of social events, to ensure that older adults who are able to drive can have a good quality of life by driving to social activities.

University of North Texas Health Science Center, Denton, Texas, United States
Introduction: Drugged driving, the act of operating vehicles under the influence of one or more illicit substances is responsible for numerous emergency department visits, deaths, and increased medical costs. Despite higher instances of drug use, older sexual minority (LGB) adults are often neglected in prevention efforts. This study assessed inequities between sexual minority older adults and their heterosexual counterparts in drugged driving across three difference substances (alcohol, marijuana, other drugs).
Methods: Pooled data from individuals 50 years or older (n = 43,238; 1,115 sexual minority adults) in the 2015-2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health were analyzed.
Past-year driving under the influence of alcohol, marijuana, and illicit drugs were outcome variables, and survey-weighted frequencies with 95% confidence limits and crude ORs with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated.
Results: In the past year, 4.82% of older adults drove under the influence of alcohol, 1.33% drove under the influence of marijuana, and 1.48% drove under the influence of illicit drugs. Sexual minority adults consistently showed higher odds of drugged driving than their heterosexual counterparts, with individuals who identify as bisexual being most at risk for driving under the influence of illicit drugs (aOR:4.49, 95%CI: 2.84, 7.08) and marijuana (aOR:3.95, 95%CI: 2.39, 6.51).
Discussion: There are differences drugged driving by sexual orientation across the three substances we assessed. These rates of substance use among older sexual minority adults warrant ongoing concern, and it is critical to consider differences across the life course in designing and evaluating interventions to address inequities.

UNDERSTANDING DRIVING AVOIDANCE AMONG OLDER AFRICAN AMERICANS AND WHITES WITH DIABETES
Henrietta Armah, 1 Maya Martin, 2 Wesley Browning, 1 Ghislaine Atkins, 1 and Olivio Clay, 1 , 1. University of Alabama at Birmingham,Birmingham,Alabama,United States,2. Tuskegee University,Tuskegee,Alabama,United States Diabetes mellitus is one of the most common chronic diseases with half of the new diagnoses affecting adults aged 60 years and older. Although African Americans are more likely to develop the disease, they are also less likely to receive healthcare. Importantly, living with diabetes is likely to negatively impact mobility for aging adults as the disease is associated with lower physical functioning (e.g., ability to maintain one's balance). Further, diabetes could pose a significant threat to a person with diabetes' ability to drive and remain in the community. This study examines the relationships and influences of social determinants of health (e.g., race, gender, socioeconomic status) and cognition on avoiding driving maneuvers such as driving at night and in rush hour traffic among older adults with diabetes. Data from the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Diabetes and Aging Study of Health (DASH) were analyzed and of the 224 participants, 193 (86.16%) were current drivers. There was a gender difference with 94.12% of males and 79.51% of females being current drivers, p < .01. Within the sample of current drivers, 45% were African American and being female, not married, lower levels of education and cognition, low income, and being African American were associated with higher scores on driving avoidance. Cognition explained 30.44% of the racial difference in driving avoidance. Findings from this study will help identify individuals who are at-risk for reduced mobility and identify those who may need to be intervened upon to support a better quality of life.